Energy · Midstream & Pipelines
Midstream & Pipelines Sector Primer
Midstream and pipelines primer with an Excel valuation model. Covers distributable cash flow, coverage, leverage, contract quality and EV/EBITDA.
2026 Edition · data as of June 2026
- pages
- 43
- sections
- 15
- model sheets
- 11
Choose a format
PDF only
The full primer
£25 / ~$32
- 43 pages, 15 sections
- Worked examples and applied cases
- 2026 Edition, data as of June 2026
Excel model
Valuation template
£45 / ~$58
- 11 sheets (.xlsx)
- Runs the primer's worked valuations live
PDF + Excel model Best value
Both files together
£59 / ~$76
- The 43-page primer
- The 11-sheet Excel model
- £70 bought separately · £11 less
Complete Energy Library
All three Energy industries: three primers, three Excel models (Oil & Gas, Midstream, and Refining).
Inside the primer
The 15-section contents, a worked valuation page, and the Excel dashboard.
Contents
- 01 How Midstream Makes Money
- 02 Listed Midstream Types
- 03 Structure and Asset Life Ladder
- 04 Segments and Sub-Markets
- 05 Revenue Drivers: Generic Toll Build
- 06 Cost Structure: Distributable Cash Flow, Coverage and Leverage
- 07 Valuation Frameworks
- 08 Worked Examples: Ten-Year Discounted Cash Flow Valuation
- 09 Worked Example: Build vs Buy
- 10 Applied Case: Coverage and Leverage
- 11 Applied Case: Contract Quality and Volume
- 12 The Companies in This Primer
- 13 Key Metrics and Screening
- 14 Risks, Benchmarks and Case Study
- 15 Glossary and Cheat Sheet
Worked examples and applied cases · 43 pages · 15 sections · 2 worked DCFs
The Excel model
Educational material. This primer and its model are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and they are not personalised. Worked valuations use illustrative calibrations, not fair-value estimates for any company.
Midstream companies collect fees for moving, processing and storing hydrocarbons between the wellhead and the refinery or export dock. Cash tracks contracted volume times tariff, not the spot oil or gas price, so a reserve-NAV or commodity-sensitivity lens misreads the equity. What matters is contract quality, throughput growth, how much cash survives to the distribution or dividend, and whether the balance sheet can fund both the payout and growth capital.
Midstream valuation benchmarks by structure
A pipe earns the same toll whether a partnership or a corporation owns it, but structure changes the cash line, the payout and the multiple. These are the primer's coarse bands by issuer type.
| Structure | Distribution coverage | Leverage (debt / EBITDA) | Multiple and income read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent MLP | 1.4-1.8x | 3.0-4.5x | EV/EBITDA in the 8-10x band; distribution yield 5-8% |
| Refiner-sponsored MLP | 1.3-1.5x | Carries a sponsor-risk premium | The MLP band, read against the price of sponsor dropdowns |
| US C-corp | Not used; dividend policy instead | 3.5-5.0x | Higher multiples than pure MLPs; free cash flow or adjusted funds from operations |
| Canadian cross-listed | Not used; distributable cash flow per share in CAD | 4.5-5.0x | Canadian-dollar operating metrics against a US-dollar market cap |
The primer anchors large-cap EV/EBITDA at 9.0x, between a pure-MLP index at 8.6x forward and a C-corp-heavy index at 10.9x. Part of that gap is tax friction, since partnership paperwork shrinks the MLP holder base. Coverage below 1.0x means the payout is not funded from cash, 1.0-1.4x is adequate and above 1.4x is comfortable. For growth underwriting the primer caps leverage at 4.5x, and a new project adds value when its build multiple sits below the trading band.
Worked example: a midstream discounted cash flow valuation
Take Riverbend, the primer's fictional mid-cap MLP: $5,000 million of adjusted EBITDA, $1,000 million of cash interest, $400 million of maintenance capex and net debt at 3.5 times EBITDA. Its distributable cash flow is $3,600 million against $2,250 million of distributions. Now value it the way the primer values its archetypes, using its MLP conversion. Of each dollar of EBITDA, 62 cents survives as unlevered free cash flow after maintenance capex, cash tax and the growth capex that buys 2.5% a year of growth. That cash is discounted at 9.0%, a 4.50% ten-year Treasury yield plus a 4.5% risk premium.
| Step | Amount |
|---|---|
| Unlevered free cash flow, base year (62% of $5,000M) | $3,100M |
| PV of years 1-10 (growing 2.5%, discounted at 9.0%) | $22,452M |
| PV of terminal value (Gordon growth) | $26,433M |
| Enterprise value | $48,885M |
| Implied EV/EBITDA | 9.8x |
| Less net debt (3.5x EBITDA) | -$17,500M |
| Equity value | $31,385M |
The discounted cash flow implies 9.8x EBITDA, inside the 8-10x band; a flat 9.0x screen would put enterprise value $3,885 million lower. Distributions are a 7.2% yield on that equity value, inside the 5-8% band, and coverage is 1.60x. Leverage is the tighter gate. Debt at 3.5x leaves $5,000 million of headroom to the 4.5x ceiling, and a $1,000 million debt-funded project lifts leverage to 3.7x before its EBITDA arrives. Value is most sensitive to the discount rate and growth rate: at a 10% discount rate equity value falls 21%, and at 8% it rises 28%.
The primer runs the same method on two larger archetypes, an MLP and a C-corp gas network, with a discount-rate-by-growth grid and a build-versus-buy test. The Excel model runs both on your own inputs.
Which midstream valuation method fits which company
| Company type | Primary method | Check with | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent MLP | Unlevered discounted cash flow, screened on EV/EBITDA | Coverage and distribution yield | Pass-through structure pushes cash to unitholders now |
| Refiner-sponsored MLP | Coverage, plus the price paid on sponsor dropdowns | EV/EBITDA | Related-party asset sales can distort the multiple |
| US C-corp gas network | EV/EBITDA plus free cash flow or adjusted funds from operations | Leverage against the company's own target | Entity tax sits between earnings and dividends |
| Canadian cross-listed | Distributable cash flow per share in CAD | Leverage against the stated target band | Canadian-dollar metrics; US-dollar market cap for peer comparisons |
| A growth project | Build multiple against the 8-10x trading band | Leverage headroom to 4.5x | It adds value only if the financing fits |
What the full primer adds
The primer maps listed structures first (MLP, C-corp, Canadian cross-listed), then the cash vocabulary: distributable cash flow and coverage at partnerships, free cash flow at corporations, leverage on each issuer's own terms, and the footnote traps that make fee-based percentages non-comparable across filings. In this sector DCF means distributable cash flow, so the primer labels the valuation method "DCF valuation" to keep the two apart. That method is the headline one: a ten-year unlevered discounted cash flow, cross-checked on EV/EBITDA and distribution yield. Two worked valuations carry it: an illustrative MLP contracted-cash-flow perpetuity and a C-corp gas network. A build-versus-buy test on a growth project sits alongside. Applied cases on coverage, leverage, contract quality and volume show how to read a peer set without treating every headline ratio as equivalent.
Shorter free guides on the site cover the same mechanics (structure, cash definitions, take-or-pay contracts, screening multiples) in standalone form; research profiles apply the screens to filed names. The companion Excel model runs to eleven sheets, from the two worked valuations to a coverage-and-leverage screen. Its rates and screen thresholds sit on one assumptions sheet, with the Treasury yield shared with the other Selborne models.
Sheets: Quick Start, Instructions, Assumptions, MLP, C-Corp Gas Network, Valuation Summary, Distribution Coverage, Leverage & Contract Quality, EV-EBITDA Screen, Sensitivity, Dashboard.
Midstream valuation: free guides
Midstream valuation FAQ
- How do you value a midstream company?
- The primer's headline method is a ten-year discounted cash flow on unlevered free cash flow: adjusted EBITDA times a conversion of about 60-62% after maintenance capex, growth capex and cash tax, growing with contracted volumes and discounted at 9.0%, then a Gordon growth terminal value. EV/EBITDA against index anchors, distribution coverage and yield are the cross-checks. Reserve NAV and commodity-price models do not fit, because cash tracks contracted volume times tariff.
- What EV/EBITDA multiple do midstream companies trade at?
- The primer reads large-cap midstream in an 8-10x band anchored at 9.0x. A pure-MLP index stood at 8.6x forward EBITDA against 10.9x for a C-corp-heavy index, a gap that comes partly from the tax friction of partnership units. The primer's worked discounted cash flow valuations imply 9.5-9.8x.
- What is a good distribution coverage ratio?
- Coverage is distributable cash flow divided by distributions paid. Above 1.4x is comfortable and funds growth without issuing equity at a bad moment; 1.0-1.4x is adequate; below 1.0x the payout is not covered from cash. Read it beside leverage: a partnership at the 1.4x floor with a heavy capex programme has little room if a project slips.
- What does DCF mean in midstream?
- Usually distributable cash flow: adjusted EBITDA less cash interest and maintenance capex, the cash available to pay unitholders before growth capex. It is not discounted cash flow, the valuation method. Not every filer reports it either, since C-corps lead with free cash flow or adjusted funds from operations, so relabel each company's cash line before ranking coverage or yield.
- Why do MLPs trade at lower multiples than C-corps?
- Partly because of tax paperwork. MLP units send each holder a Schedule K-1, which many taxable and institutional investors avoid, so the holder base is narrower than for a C-corp paying ordinary 1099 dividends. The same friction was one reason for the C-corp roll-ups of 2014-2019; in the same years the large partnerships removed the incentive distribution rights that had raised their cost of equity.
See this methodology applied to a real company:
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) →