Technology · Software
Software FCF Before vs After Stock Pay
Reported free cash flow adds stock pay back. A consistent valuation either charges that cost or counts the dilution, never neither.
Selborne Research · Software coverage: 11 guides, 6 company profiles, a primer and Excel model
Educational analysis. This guide is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
On this page
Reported FCF Treats Stock Pay as If It Were Free
Start from net income, add back stock-based compensation because no cash left the company that day, subtract capital expenditure, and you have the free cash flow figure most software filings and press tables lead with. The arithmetic is correct as far as cash in the period goes. It is incomplete as a measure of what owners keep, because the awards still transfer value through dilution.
Two treatments are consistent. Charge stock pay as a cost and discount free cash flow after stock pay. Or leave reported free cash flow alone and grow the share count with the grants (and with net issuance after buybacks). Skip both and you count equity compensation as free. Apply both and you punish the firm twice.
Three Filings, Before and After
ServiceNow, Snowflake and SAP span a wide stock-pay range, which makes the gap easy to see. Free cash flow is operating cash flow less capex; the after column subtracts stock-based compensation.
| Company | Fiscal year | Stock pay % of revenue | FCF | FCF margin | FCF after stock pay | FCF margin after stock pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceNow | FY2025 | 14.7% | $4.6B ($4,576M) | 34.5% | $2.6B ($2,621M) | 19.7% |
| Snowflake | FY2026 | 34.1% | $1.1B ($1,120M) | 23.9% | -$0.5B (-$479M) | -10.2% |
| SAP | FY2025 | 4.6% | €8.4B | 22.9% | €6.7B | 18.3% |
Snowflake is the blunt case: reported free cash flow is positive at 23.9% of revenue; after stock pay it is negative at -10.2%. ServiceNow stays positive on both bases, but the margin falls from 34.5% to 19.7%. SAP’s stock pay is lighter at 4.6% of revenue, so the after-stock-pay margin (18.3%) sits closer to the reported 22.9%.
The ranked stock-pay intensities behind these gaps are in stock pay as a share of revenue.
Why the Add-Back Exists
ASC 718 puts the grant-date award value through the income statement over the vesting period. Cash did not move when the expense hit earnings, so the cash-flow statement adds it back inside operating cash flow. That presentation answers “how much cash did operations generate this year?” It does not answer “how much value did existing owners retain after paying employees partly in equity?”
Buybacks that offset dilution move the cash out later, often in a different period than the add-back. Net dilution after buybacks is the residual share-count story when you choose the dilution method instead of the charge method.
Where This Shows Up in Screens
A Rule of 40 sum that uses reported free cash flow margin will sit higher, sometimes much higher, than the same growth rate plus free cash flow after stock pay. Vertical acquirers that avoid option plans remove the gap by construction: Constellation Software reports nil stock-option expense, so its free cash flow available to shareholders is not flattered by an ASC 718 add-back of grants it never made.
When two models disagree on a software name, check the stock-pay line before you check the discount rate. The cash gap is often larger than the WACC debate.
Free cash flow after stock pay is the headline cash measure in the software model; the primer shows it beside reported FCF so the gap is visible.
- 17 sections, from the recurring-revenue roll-forward and retention disclosure to stock pay, the Rule of 40, usage pricing, the licence-to-cloud transition and serial acquirers
- 42 pages
- a seat SaaS grower, a usage-priced platform, a licence-to-cloud platform and a vertical-software acquirer, all fictional
- 4 worked valuations
- listed software companies on filed margins, stock pay, free cash flow and backlog, each with its fiscal year
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's recurring-revenue DCF live across 13 sheets: a seat SaaS grower, a usage-priced platform, a licence-to-cloud platform and a vertical-software acquirer, all fictional, plus a column for a company of your own in any of the four business models. Revenue rolls forward from gross and net retention and new-customer revenue, fading to terminal levels that set perpetual growth. Margins move in a straight line to year 10, and stock pay is charged as a cost or counted through dilution. A licence base migrates to the cloud at a conversion ratio you set, and an acquirer's deals earn their own margin. A reverse DCF reads the growth a price requires, and the sensitivity grids re-run the model in every cell.
See what's in the Software Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Technology industries
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why does reported free cash flow add stock-based compensation back?
- Stock-based compensation is a non-cash expense in the period, so the cash-flow statement adds it back when reconciling net income to operating cash flow. Reported free cash flow (operating cash flow less capex) therefore excludes the cost of equity awards unless you subtract stock pay again.
- What are the two consistent ways to treat stock pay in a valuation?
- Either charge stock-based compensation as a cost when you build free cash flow, or leave it added back and let the diluted share count rise with the grants. Doing neither overstates cash available to existing owners; doing both double-counts the hit.
- How large is the gap between FCF before and after stock pay?
- It equals stock pay as a share of revenue when you start from reported FCF. In the worked filings here, ServiceNow FY2025 moves from a 34.5% FCF margin to 19.7% after stock pay; Snowflake FY2026 from 23.9% to -10.2%; SAP FY2025 from 22.9% to 18.3%.
- Does SAP report free cash flow the same way as US GAAP filers?
- SAP reports under IFRS. The free cash flow figures used here are still operating cash flow less capex (€8.4B, 22.9% of FY2025 revenue), with stock pay of 4.6% of revenue subtracted for the after-stock-pay margin of 18.3%.
Read next
Rule of 40: Which Margin Goes In
Growth plus margin depends on which margin you choose: FCF, FCF after stock pay, or operating margin. The 40% bar is shown on a fictional company.
Stock Pay as a Share of Revenue in Software
Stock-based compensation is a real operating cost under ASC 718. Across six filers it ranges from nil to over a third of revenue.
Vertical Software Acquirers: Return on Acquired Capital
Serial acquirers of mission-critical software grow by reinvesting cash. Value turns on reinvestment rate times return on acquired capital.
See it applied
These company profiles apply the concepts from this guide to real public companies.
Also in Software
- Net Revenue Retention: How Filers Define It
- Gross vs Net Revenue Retention
- Usage-Based Pricing and Net Retention
- Rule of 40: Which Margin Goes In
- Stock Pay as a Share of Revenue in Software
- Software FCF Before vs After Stock Pay
- RPO and cRPO in Software
- Current Share of RPO by Software Company
- Licence-to-Cloud Transitions and the Revenue Dip
- Reverse DCF for Software Stocks
- Vertical Software Acquirers: Return on Acquired Capital