Chemicals · Commodity Chemicals
Westlake (WLK)
Westlake as the PVC/chlor-alkali case: FY2025 adjusted EBITDA of $1,144M versus GAAP EBITDA of ($248)M after $1,392M of identified items.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 Adj. EBITDA (ex. items)
- $1,144M
- FY2025 GAAP EBITDA
- ($248)M
- Identified Items
- $1,392M
- Net Debt / FY2025 Adj. EBITDA
- 2.3x (calculated)
- Production Capacity in North America
- ~85%
- Ethylene Feedstock
- Ethane (Lake Charles, Calvert City)
- Adj. EBITDA Margin
- 10% vs 19% prior yr
Why the GAAP Line Misleads Here
Westlake shows why a commodity chemicals screen must say which EBITDA it uses. FY2025 EBITDA excluding identified items was $1,144M, down 50% from $2,286M, and the margin fell to 10% from 19%. GAAP EBITDA was a $248M loss after $1,392M of identified items: a goodwill write-off, plant shutdowns and restructuring. Net debt was $2,656M at 31 December 2025 (calculated), 2.3x the adjusted figure.
An EV/EBITDA multiple on the GAAP figure means nothing, because the denominator is negative. The adjusted line is the one to compare across years, but it still carries 2025's depressed spreads.
Westlake makes PVC and the chlorine and caustic soda that go into it (chlor-alkali), and cracks ethane, a natural-gas liquid, into ethylene at Lake Charles and Calvert City. It has about 85% of its production capacity in North America, where it cites energy and feedstock advantages (Q4 2025 earnings presentation). Its main chain is PVC; Dow and LyondellBasell are mostly polyethylene. The feedstock point is the same: US ethane crackers sit low on the global ethylene cost curve when gas is cheap against oil.
How the Numbers Read
Management described "global overcapacity in certain PEM materials", PEM being its performance and essential materials segment, and said 2026 was "not expected to be a tailwind". It did not use the word trough.
That leverage ratio divides by a downturn year's EBITDA. Leverage is better judged on mid-cycle EBITDA, and Westlake files no company-wide mid-cycle figure, so that has to be built from capacity, utilisation and long-run spreads.
Cheap ethane explains the cost position; the ethane vs naphtha guide covers the yields. But Westlake's chain earns on ethylene and PVC spreads, so LyondellBasell's $580/t North American PE margin does not measure it.
How You Would Value a Business Like This
Any multiple comes after EBITDA is rebuilt at mid-cycle PVC and chain spreads; the Selborne Excel model assumes PVC at 54¢/lb over the long run. The mid-cycle EBITDA guide works the arithmetic and the multiples on fictional producers.
Westlake's PEM profitability improvement plan targets $600M of EBITDA improvement in 2026. That is a programme target and does not replace building a company-wide mid-cycle figure.
What to Watch in the Financials
Identified items. FY2025's included a $727M goodwill write-off plus plant shutdown and restructuring costs; if such charges recur, the adjusted line overstates normal earnings.
Margin. A move back towards the FY2024 margin would show spreads recovering.
Overcapacity commentary. Management's language on PEM oversupply is the demand and supply signal for PVC and derivatives; the cycle guide sets it beside the other producers.
Key Risks
PVC and chlor-alkali spreads. The chain behaves differently from PE, so PE margin data does not track it.
Commodity Chemicals Sector Primer
Three hypothetical producers, in polyethylene, methanol and PVC, valued year by year as spreads recover from the trough, set beside the through-cycle multiple screen.
- 15 sections, from how a spread business earns to a year-by-year reversion DCF and leverage on mid-cycle EBITDA
- 42 pages
- an ethane-advantaged polyethylene producer, a methanol producer and a chlor-alkali and PVC producer
- 3 producer engines
- listed producers across the ethylene, vinyl, methanol and acetyls chains on filed FY2025 figures
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's cycle-normalisation valuation live across 12 sheets: three producer tabs (ethane-advantaged polyethylene, methanol, and chlor-alkali and PVC), each reverting its spread and utilisation from trough to mid-cycle through a ten-year free-cash-flow schedule with working capital and sustaining capex; a valuation summary setting each DCF beside the through-cycle multiple screen; cycle scenarios, a cost-curve position, a leverage screen on mid-cycle EBITDA and two live sensitivity grids. Change the spread, the WACC or the exit multiple and the value moves.
See what's in the Commodity Chemicals Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Chemicals industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Ethane vs Naphtha: Feedstock Advantage
Ethane yields 80-84% ethylene vs naphtha 29-34%; US ~78% ethane feedslate; why USGC sits low on the global curve and naphtha units idle first.
Mid-Cycle EBITDA for Commodity Chemicals
Why LTM fails at cycle extremes; company frameworks from Dow, Olin, MEOH, LYB; ~6-9x EV/EBITDA on normalised earnings; leverage on mid-cycle EBITDA.
Reading the Petrochemical Cycle
Spread mean-reversion, utilisation as early warning, trough language across the peer set, and why normalised prices differ from spot prints.
Reported vs Adjusted EBITDA in Chemicals
What six producers add back to reach adjusted EBITDA, why write-downs and closures dominate a bad year, and which figure answers which question.