Chemicals · Commodity Chemicals
LyondellBasell (LYB)
LyondellBasell publishes the industry PE margin: $580/t in 2025 versus $830/t for 2013-22. FY2025 EBITDA ex. items was $2,543M.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 EBITDA (ex. items)
- $2,543M
- FY2025 Reported EBITDA
- $1,126M
- Net Debt / EBITDA ex. Items
- 3.7x (company)
- NA Integrated PE Margin
- $580/t (2025)
- Historical PE Margin
- $830/t (2013-22 avg)
- Value Enhancement Program EBITDA
- $1.1B at 2017-19 margins (co. est.)
- 4Q25 Americas Olefins & Polyolefins Operating Rate
- ~75% (crackers ~90%)
The Industry Margin Disclosure
LyondellBasell publishes the clearest industry series for North American polyethylene (PE) margins, the number every spread model needs. In its Q4 2025 earnings slides, using Chemical Market Analytics (CMA) data, the North American integrated PE margin averaged $580/t in 2025 against $830/t for 2013-22, 30% below. Across all its businesses, LyondellBasell put 2025 industry margins about 45% below their historical averages. Management said margins reflected a cyclical trough and called the downturn one of the longest in the industry.
FY2025 EBITDA excluding identified items was $2,543M, against reported EBITDA of $1,126M after charges. Net debt was $9,489M at 31 December 2025, and the company put net debt at 3.7x EBITDA on the ex-items basis.
The feedstock splits by region. The Americas crackers, the plants that split feedstock into ethylene, run on ethane and other natural-gas liquids; the European units run on naphtha, an oil-derived feed. In an oversupply the naphtha crackers of Europe and Northeast Asia are the high-cost tonnes that idle first. The ethylene and PE spreads guide separates the cracker margin in ¢/lb from the integrated PE margin in $/t, the two units LyondellBasell's slides mix.
How the Numbers Read
The $1,417M gap between the two EBITDA figures is mostly write-downs, so a screen on reported earnings misleads. The ex-items line is the one to compare across years, and it still needs normalising, because it carries 2025's spreads.
LyondellBasell's Value Enhancement Program (VEP), a set of plant reliability, cost and commercial improvements, delivered $1.1B of recurring annual EBITDA by the end of 2025, measured at 2017-19 mid-cycle margins and operating rates (company estimate). The target is now $1.5B by 2028. It covers only one programme, but it is a filed bridge between downturn spreads and management's view of normal earnings.
LyondellBasell also gave segment operating rates for 4Q25: Olefins & Polyolefins (O&P) Americas ran at about 75% (its crackers about 90%) and Intermediates & Derivatives (I&D) at about 75%. Utilisation falls before margins do, so these rates are the early warning.
How You Would Value a Business Like This
The industry margins behind the ex-items EBITDA were well below their long-run averages, so a multiple on it would mislead. The method rebuilds EBITDA at a long-run PE margin first; the Selborne Excel model uses $650/t, between the 2025 figure and history. The same goes for leverage: the company's ratio divides by a downturn year's EBITDA. The mid-cycle EBITDA guide works the arithmetic and the multiples on fictional producers.
What to Watch in the Financials
The industry PE margin. A move back towards the 2013-22 average is the clearest published sign of recovery.
Identified items. FY2025's were mostly asset write-downs; if such items recur, the ex-items line overstates normal earnings.
VEP delivery. Progress towards the 2028 target.
Segment operating rates. The quarterly rates are the first place a turn would show.
Key Risks
European naphtha exposure. The Americas' ethane advantage does not protect the European plants when naphtha units sit at the top of the cost curve.
A long downturn. When spreads recover matters more than anything else in the numbers.
Commodity Chemicals Sector Primer
Three hypothetical producers, in polyethylene, methanol and PVC, valued year by year as spreads recover from the trough, set beside the through-cycle multiple screen.
- 15 sections, from how a spread business earns to a year-by-year reversion DCF and leverage on mid-cycle EBITDA
- 42 pages
- an ethane-advantaged polyethylene producer, a methanol producer and a chlor-alkali and PVC producer
- 3 producer engines
- listed producers across the ethylene, vinyl, methanol and acetyls chains on filed FY2025 figures
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's cycle-normalisation valuation live across 12 sheets: three producer tabs (ethane-advantaged polyethylene, methanol, and chlor-alkali and PVC), each reverting its spread and utilisation from trough to mid-cycle through a ten-year free-cash-flow schedule with working capital and sustaining capex; a valuation summary setting each DCF beside the through-cycle multiple screen; cycle scenarios, a cost-curve position, a leverage screen on mid-cycle EBITDA and two live sensitivity grids. Change the spread, the WACC or the exit multiple and the value moves.
See what's in the Commodity Chemicals Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Chemicals industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Ethylene and Polyethylene Spreads
Cracker margin vs integrated PE margin vs colloquial spread; FY2025 NA PE at $580/t vs $830/t history; illustrative ethane cracker margin 12¢/lb.
Ethane vs Naphtha: Feedstock Advantage
Ethane yields 80-84% ethylene vs naphtha 29-34%; US ~78% ethane feedslate; why USGC sits low on the global curve and naphtha units idle first.
Reading the Petrochemical Cycle
Spread mean-reversion, utilisation as early warning, trough language across the peer set, and why normalised prices differ from spot prints.
Steam Cracker Yields by Feedstock
Five cracker feeds ranked by ethylene yield, from ethane to gas oil: tonnes of feed per tonne of ethylene, and the co-products that grow as the feed gets heavier.
Reported vs Adjusted EBITDA in Chemicals
What six producers add back to reach adjusted EBITDA, why write-downs and closures dominate a bad year, and which figure answers which question.