Agribusiness · Aquaculture
SalMar (SALM)
SalMar in FY2025: NOK 13.6/kg group operational EBIT, 284,500 t harvest, 173,118 t Norway biomass cap, and regions from Northern Norway to SalMar Ocean.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- Central Norway EBIT/kg
- NOK 6.3/kg
- FY2025 Harvest, Gutted Weight
- 284,500 t (300,900 t incl. part-owned firms)
- Group Operational EBIT/kg
- NOK 13.6/kg
- Northern Norway EBIT/kg
- NOK 20.7/kg
- Norway Licensed Biomass Cap
- 173,118 t
- Net Debt excl. Leases
- NOK 20.8bn
- Survival at Sea (12 months)
- 94.8%
- SalMar Ocean EBIT/kg
- NOK -23.7/kg
Business Overview
SalMar shows how much a group's EBIT per kg can hide. It earned NOK 13.6/kg of group operational EBIT in FY2025, but its farming regions ranged from a profit of NOK 20.7/kg to a loss of NOK 23.7/kg. Operational EBIT is the profit measure salmon farmers report alongside IFRS: it leaves out the accounting revaluation of fish still in the sea, so it tracks the fish actually sold.
The group harvested 284,500 t gutted weight, or 300,900 t including companies it part-owns. Northern Norway earned NOK 20.7/kg and Central Norway NOK 6.3/kg. Two newer businesses lost money: Icelandic Salmon lost NOK 16.7/kg and SalMar Ocean, its offshore farming venture, lost NOK 23.7/kg. The group figure also includes its sales and processing segment, which harvests no fish of its own: its profit enters group EBIT but adds no kilos to divide by, so the group figure is not a pure farming margin.
How the Numbers Read
The NOK 14.4/kg gap between Northern and Central Norway, inside one company and one country, shows how much licence location, biology and logistics matter. A shift in harvest between the two regions moves the group figure with no change in the salmon price.
SalMar's Norwegian licences allowed 173,118 t of maximum allowed biomass (MAB) at 31 December 2025. MAB caps the weight of live fish in the sea at any one moment. Fish are stocked, grown and harvested through the year, so the stock turns over and a year's harvest can exceed the cap: its two Norwegian farming regions alone harvested 264,600 t (Central 145,400 t, Northern 119,200 t), well above it. New licence capacity takes 12-18 months to show up in harvest, as the MAB capacity guide explains.
Twelve-month rolling survival at sea was 94.8% in FY2025, against 93.0% in 2024. Grieg Seafood reported 91% on the same basis.
Net interest-bearing debt was NOK 20,848m excluding leases (NOK 22,549m including them) at 31 December 2025. That is 5.4 times FY2025 operational EBIT of NOK 3,867m.
Valuation Framework
Tax comes first for a Norwegian farmer. Since 1 January 2023, profit from farming salmon in the sea in Norway has carried a 25% resource-rent tax on top of 22% corporate tax. SalMar said on 31 May 2023, when Parliament adopted the tax, that it took its marginal rate "from 22% to 47%". Iceland is outside the Norwegian tax, so a cash-flow valuation must apply it to the Norwegian share of EBIT alone.
Salmon farmers are also compared on enterprise value per kg of harvest. For SalMar, the harvest figure must match what the enterprise value includes (consolidated, or with part-owned companies), and the loss-making Iceland and offshore businesses sit inside it. The EV/kg guide works through the choices on a fictional farm.
Norway grants growth through a traffic-light system. It grades each production area every two years on how far sea lice from farms harm wild salmon. Green areas may grow up to 6%, yellow areas are frozen and red areas are cut 6%. Growth in green areas is sold at a fixed price for the first 1% (NOK 170,000 a tonne in 2024, NOK 270,000 in 2026), and the rest at auction.
The decision of 19 June 2026 graded 3 areas green, 9 yellow and 1 red. SalMar's Central Norway farms, from Sunnmøre to the Namdal coast, all sit in yellow areas, so they cannot grow through the traffic lights until the next grading. Its Northern Norway region runs from southern Troms, which is yellow, to eastern Finnmark, which is green.
What to Watch in the Financials
Iceland and offshore. Their losses pull the group figure below what the Norwegian farms earn; watch whether they narrow.
Harvest in part-owned companies. The 16,400 t gap between the two harvest figures earns SalMar a share of profit, not revenue, unless it takes control.
Key Risks
Offshore farming. Farming salmon in the open sea needs large capital spending and is not yet proven at scale.
Debt against a cyclical profit. The debt is fixed, while operational EBIT moves with the salmon price.
Regional biology within Norway. A lice or gill problem in Central Norway takes a larger share of a thinner margin, and can pull the group figure down even if Northern Norway holds.
Two fictional salmon farmers and a farm you set up yourself, each valued after tax year by year, with EV per kg and an EBIT multiple as cross-checks.
- 15 sections, from how a salmon farmer earns to licence capacity, biological risk and a worked valuation
- 40 pages
- a low-cost scale farmer, a high-cost regional farmer and a farm you set up yourself
- 3 farm engines
- listed salmon farmers across Norway, the Faroes, Scotland and Chile on filed FY2025 figures
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's farming valuation live across 12 sheets: two hypothetical farmers and a farm you set up yourself, each valued on an after-tax DCF that includes Norway's resource-rent tax on salmon farming, with EV per kg and an EBIT multiple as cross-checks; a valuation summary, an EBIT-per-kg and cost-stack view, capacity against EV per kg, a cycle and biological downturn scenario and a live sensitivity grid of salmon price against farming cost. Change the price, the farming cost or the harvest and the value moves.
See what's in the Aquaculture Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Agribusiness industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Salmon Farming Economics: Cost per kg
What Mowi's cost in box and Grieg's farming cost include, and why each farmer's EBIT per kg has to be read on its own definition before comparing farmers.
Licence and MAB Capacity Constraints
Maximum allowed biomass and the harvest lag, SalMar 173,118 t vs Lerøy 117,500 t vs Grieg 17,800 t, how Norway adds capacity, and how the Faroes regulate instead.
EV/kg: Valuing Aquaculture Capacity
Enterprise value per kg of gutted-weight harvest capacity, how to strip non-farming assets out of EV, and why EV/kg is an analyst convention no company files.
Operational EBIT vs Reported EBIT in Salmon Farming
How IAS 41 values fish still in the sea at forward prices, what operational EBIT removes, and the FY2025 reconciliations at five salmon farmers.