Healthcare · Medtech
Boston Scientific (BSX)
The organic-vs-reported trap: FY2025 net sales of $20.1B, up 15.8% organic against 19.9% reported, and Urology at +4.7% organic versus +23.1% reported.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 Net Sales
- $20.1B
- Organic vs Reported Growth
- 15.8% organic / 19.9% reported
- Urology Organic vs Reported
- +4.7% organic / +23.1% reported
- GAAP Gross Margin
- 69.0%
- Operating Margin
- 18.0% GAAP / 28.0% adjusted
- Free Cash Flow
- $3.7B (non-GAAP, 80% conversion)
- WATCHMAN Patients
- >600,000 cumulative treated
Business Overview
Boston Scientific is where growth bought through acquisitions is easiest to see among the cardiovascular device makers. FY2025 net sales were $20,074M. Reported growth was +19.9% and organic growth 15.8%, a 4.1-point gap: 3.4 points from acquisitions and 0.7 from currency.
The segments show the effect more sharply than the group. Urology grew +23.1% reported but +4.7% organic; the reconciliation table in the FY2025 earnings release puts 17.9 of the 18.4 points down to acquisitions. Cardiovascular grew +23.2% reported and +20.8% organic, a 2.4-point gap. The organic growth guide builds its screening method around the Urology split.
GAAP gross margin was 69.0% (70.6% adjusted). GAAP operating margin was 18.0% and adjusted 28.0%. R&D was $2,052M, 10.2% of sales on GAAP (9.5% adjusted).
How the Numbers Read
Organic definition. Boston Scientific's organic growth excludes foreign exchange and acquisitions or divestitures owned for less than one full comparable period. Medtronic (4.9% organic, year to 25 April 2025) also strips deals, on its own definition, but Boston Scientific's pace of deals makes the gap visible at group and segment level.
Free cash flow ($3.7B non-GAAP, 80% conversion). Company-defined non-GAAP free cash flow was $3.659B, an 80% conversion rate, inside the company's 70-80% long-range target. Cash conversion held up in a year when reported growth overstated underlying growth.
WATCHMAN (more than 600,000 cumulative patients treated). WATCHMAN is an implant that closes off a pouch in the heart's left atrium, cutting stroke risk for patients with an irregular heartbeat. The patient count is a treatment milestone. Boston Scientific files no group installed-base figure. The installed-base guide separates milestones like this from placed-system counts such as Intuitive's 11,106 da Vinci systems.
Recurring mix, not filed. No consolidated recurring or consumable share is filed, and Cardiovascular and Urology revenue both blend capital and consumables. Only Intuitive Surgical files a group recurring share (84%); for Boston Scientific the recurring economics have to be inferred from segment mix.
Valuation Framework
Any growth-adjusted P/E for Boston Scientific should divide by 15.8% organic growth, not 19.9% reported. Dividing by the reported rate lowers the ratio and credits the business with growth it bought. Bain links roughly 2 turns of forward EV multiple to each 100 bps of revenue growth for medtech above $3B revenue (valuations as of 14 January 2024), which is why the growth input matters so much. The growth-adjusted P/E guide works the method on a fictional example.
What to Watch in the Financials
The gap between reported and organic (4.1 points for the group). A quarter where reported growth speeds up while organic stalls is acquisitions at work. Urology (+23.1% reported, +4.7% organic) is the template.
Cardiovascular organic growth (+20.8%). The segment driving the group rate. Its gap to reported (+23.2%) is small; watch whether it widens as deals continue.
FCF conversion (80%). At the top of the 70-80% target, so there is little room above it.
Adjusted operating margin (28.0%). Management's benchmark is the non-GAAP margin. GAAP at 18.0% is the one that compares across peers, so track both.
Key Risks
Integration and organic fade. Acquisitions that lift reported growth can hide a slow underlying franchise, as Urology's +4.7% organic shows. Missed synergy targets show up in the organic lines before the reported ones.
Cardiovascular competition. Medtronic, Abbott and Johnson & Johnson compete in electrophysiology (treating heart-rhythm disorders), and Abbott competes with WATCHMAN. Boston Scientific stopped selling its ACURATE TAVR valves in 2025. Whether +20.8% organic growth in Cardiovascular lasts is the open question.
Reliance on non-GAAP. The FCF and margin figures management leads with are adjusted. On GAAP, operating margin is 18.0%, and a reader has to judge which adjustments recur and which are deal-related.
What the Screening Shows
Against the Medtech Sector Primer screens:
- Organic growth: 15.8% organic against 19.9% reported (4.1-point gap: acquisitions 3.4, currency 0.7). Use organic in any growth-adjusted screen.
- Urology: +4.7% organic / +23.1% reported, the widest gap in the filed segments.
- Gross margin: 69.0% GAAP / 70.6% adjusted.
- FCF: $3.7B non-GAAP; 80% conversion (70-80% target).
- WATCHMAN: more than 600,000 cumulative patients treated (a treatment milestone).
- Recurring mix: not filed at group level.
When the group headline looks strong, Urology at +4.7% organic is the segment check. Cardiovascular, at +20.8% organic and two-thirds of sales, is the line that drives the group rate.
A franchise DCF charges reinvestment for every point of growth, fades that growth year by year, and asks how many years of it a price pays for.
- 15 sections, installed base and pull-through to a franchise DCF, the runway a price implies and growth-adjusted P/E
- 44 pages
- a razor-blade franchise and a diversified grower
- 2 worked archetypes
- large-cap device makers on filed organic growth, margins and free cash flow
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's franchise DCF live across 11 sheets: a razor-blade franchise and a diversified grower valued over 20 years on funded free cash flow, with growth held for a runway and then faded to terminal, an operating margin path and a WACC built from the cost of equity and after-tax debt; a runway table showing how many years of growth the illustrative price pays for; a valuation summary; the installed-base build; P/E implied by the DCF value and by the price, each growth-adjusted; organic-versus-reported checks; and a sensitivity grid. Change organic growth, the runway, ROIC or the WACC and the value moves.
See what's in the Medtech Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Healthcare industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Organic vs Reported Growth in Medtech
Strip M&A before comparing medtech growth: BSX Urology +4.7% organic vs +23.1% reported, FY2025 organic growth for six peers, and why multiples follow organic growth.
Growth-Adjusted P/E for Devices
Forward P/E divided by organic growth: why one headline multiple means different things at 6% and 12% growth, and which growth figure to divide by.
Razor-and-Blade Economics in Medtech
How capital platforms convert to recurring pull-through: ISRG 84% recurring mix, I&A at $1,810 per da Vinci procedure, recurring-revenue screens, and a worked 5,000-system example.
GAAP vs Adjusted Operating Margin in Medtech
What device makers leave out of adjusted operating margin: amortisation from past deals, restructuring, litigation and share-based pay, how six filers define adjusted, and which margin a DCF should carry.