Healthcare · Medtech
Intuitive Surgical (ISRG)
The recurring-mix archetype: FY2025 revenue of $10.1B, 84% of it recurring, on 11,106 da Vinci systems; the only peer that files a group recurring share.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 Revenue
- $10.1B (+21% total)
- Recurring Revenue
- 84% disclosed
- da Vinci Installed Base
- 11,106 systems
- Procedures
- ~3.15M (+18% YoY)
- I&A Pull-Through
- $1,810/da Vinci procedure
- GAAP Operating Margin
- 29.3%
- R&D Intensity
- 13.0% of sales
Business Overview
Intuitive Surgical sells a surgical robot once and then earns on every operation it performs, and it is the only company in this medtech set that files the share of revenue that repeats. FY2025 revenue was $10,064.7M, up 21%; that is total growth, since the company publishes no organic rate. Recurring revenue was 84% of the total.
The filed operating figures are the installed base and the procedures run on it. At 31 December 2025 there were 11,106 da Vinci surgical robots in the field (+12% from 9,902) and 995 Ion systems, Intuitive's robot for lung biopsies. Worldwide da Vinci procedures reached about 3.15 million (+18%), and Ion procedures rose about 51%. Instruments and accessories (I&A), the single-use tools each operation consumes, brought in $6,018.9M (59.8% of revenue, +19%), against $2,473.7M (24.6%) from selling systems. Pull-through, the I&A revenue per da Vinci procedure, was $1,810, flat on the year.
GAAP gross margin was 66.0% and GAAP operating margin 29.3%, the highest of the six. R&D was $1,311.8M, 13.0% of sales.
How the Numbers Read
84% recurring, on Intuitive's definition. The 10-K builds it from three lines: I&A $6,018.9M, service $1,572.1M and operating-lease rent on robots $874.3M, together $8,465.3M of $10,064.7M. The lease rent is booked inside systems revenue, so about a tenth of the recurring figure is robot rent rather than consumables; the razor-and-blade guide sets out the full split. Medtronic, Abbott, Stryker, Boston Scientific and Edwards file no group recurring share. We class above 70% recurring as the razor-blade archetype, and Intuitive clears it on filed data.
Systems × procedures × pull-through. 11,106 systems, each running about 284 procedures a year, at $1,810 of I&A per da Vinci procedure gives about $5.7B, against $6.0B of I&A reported. The $1,810 counts da Vinci only; most of the other $0.3B is instruments for Ion procedures. The installed-base guide teaches the chain on these figures. Procedure growth (+18% da Vinci, +51% Ion) shows up first, and I&A revenue (+19%) follows it.
Growth input: 21% total. With no organic line, 21% total growth is the figure for peer tables. Boston Scientific grew 15.8% organic (19.9% reported), Stryker 10.3% organic, Edwards +10.7% at constant currency, Abbott 5.5% organic and Medtronic 4.9% organic (year to 25 April 2025). The growth-adjusted P/E guide explains why a headline P/E compares poorly across growth rates this far apart.
Free cash flow about $2.5B. Operating cash flow of $3,030M less $539.8M of property and equipment purchases, from the 10-K.
Valuation Framework
Intuitive shows in filed numbers what a high-recurring franchise looks like, so a valuation starts from procedures. Pull-through was flat at $1,810 while procedures grew 18%, so FY2025 revenue growth came from volume alone.
That makes procedure growth the input that matters most. A fall in pull-through would reach the recurring 84% of revenue directly, while a slowdown in system sales would touch only the 24.6% that is capital.
What to Watch in the Financials
Procedure growth (~3.15M, +18%). I&A revenue tracks procedures, so a slowdown shows up there first.
Pull-through ($1,810 per da Vinci procedure). Flat in FY2025. More complex procedures could lift it; competitive instrument pricing could push it down.
Systems against recurring mix. Systems were 24.6% of revenue. A burst of placements can dilute the recurring share for a while without any change in the economics.
Ion is early and growing fast: 995 systems and +51% procedures. Whether its pull-through matches da Vinci's as it scales is still open.
Key Risks
Competing robots. Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson and others are placing rival systems. Intuitive's defence is its installed base and surgeons' familiarity with the workflow as much as its patents.
Hospital capital budgets. The 84% is not fully insulated from them. Lease rent on robots is part of it, and system sales are the other 16% of revenue, so a squeeze on hospital budgets would slow placements even with procedure volumes holding.
Growth duration. At 21% growth, much of a long-range forecast rests on procedure growth lasting for years, which no single quarter of I&A can confirm.
What the Screening Shows
Against the Medtech Sector Primer screens:
- Recurring revenue: 84% disclosed, including operating-lease systems; above the 70% razor-blade line, and the only filed group share in the set.
- Installed base: 11,106 da Vinci and 995 Ion systems at 31 Dec 2025.
- Procedures: ~3.15M da Vinci (+18% YoY).
- I&A: $6,018.9M (59.8% of revenue); $1,810 per da Vinci procedure.
- Operating margin: 29.3% GAAP, highest of the six.
- Growth: 21% total revenue; no organic rate filed.
A franchise DCF charges reinvestment for every point of growth, fades that growth year by year, and asks how many years of it a price pays for.
- 15 sections, installed base and pull-through to a franchise DCF, the runway a price implies and growth-adjusted P/E
- 44 pages
- a razor-blade franchise and a diversified grower
- 2 worked archetypes
- large-cap device makers on filed organic growth, margins and free cash flow
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's franchise DCF live across 11 sheets: a razor-blade franchise and a diversified grower valued over 20 years on funded free cash flow, with growth held for a runway and then faded to terminal, an operating margin path and a WACC built from the cost of equity and after-tax debt; a runway table showing how many years of growth the illustrative price pays for; a valuation summary; the installed-base build; P/E implied by the DCF value and by the price, each growth-adjusted; organic-versus-reported checks; and a sensitivity grid. Change organic growth, the runway, ROIC or the WACC and the value moves.
See what's in the Medtech Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Healthcare industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Razor-and-Blade Economics in Medtech
How capital platforms convert to recurring pull-through: ISRG 84% recurring mix, I&A at $1,810 per da Vinci procedure, recurring-revenue screens, and a worked 5,000-system example.
Installed Base and Pull-Through
Systems, users, and procedures as the medtech demand engine: filed installed-base KPIs for ISRG and ABT Libre, SYK Mako cumulative procedures, and the pull-through arithmetic.
Growth-Adjusted P/E for Devices
Forward P/E divided by organic growth: why one headline multiple means different things at 6% and 12% growth, and which growth figure to divide by.