Healthcare · Pharmaceuticals
Merck (MRK)
Merck: Keytruda was 48.7% of FY2025 sales, its US compound patent ends December 2028 and a Medicare price is expected from 2029. How to model one dated cliff.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 Sales
- $65,011M
- Keytruda Concentration
- $31,680M (48.7%)
- Keytruda US Compound Patent
- December 2028
- R&D Intensity
- 24.3% of sales
- Operating Margin
- ~32.6% (computed)
- Dividend / Payout
- $3.24/sh; 44.5% GAAP
Half of Sales on One Patent Date
Keytruda, a cancer immunotherapy, sold $31,680M in FY2025, 48.7% of Merck's $65,011M. The figure includes Keytruda Qlex, the version injected under the skin.
The primary US compound patent expires in December 2028. Two related patents run to May and November 2029, and Merck expects both to be litigated. It also expects Keytruda to be selected for Medicare price-setting under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2027, with the price applying from January 2029. Nearly half of revenue therefore faces a patent date and a price date about a month apart. That makes Merck the reference case for forecasting sales after loss of exclusivity (LOE). Keytruda sits well above the 40% line for high concentration (see the concentration guide).
R&D, Margin and Payout
R&D was $15,789M, 24.3% of sales, the highest of the six large drugmakers covered here and above the 20.9% average in the survey by PhRMA, the US drug industry body. Part of the gap is where costs are booked: Merck puts licence upfronts and asset-acquisition charges inside R&D, where some peers use a separate line (see the R&D intensity guide).
Merck's income statement has no operating income line, so the ~32.6% margin is computed: pre-tax operating profit of approximately $21,218M over sales. The Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson profiles compute theirs the same way, so the three compare on one basis.
The dividend was $3.24 per share, 44.5% of GAAP EPS of $7.28. At Pfizer and AbbVie amortisation distorts the GAAP payout (see the payout trap guide).
Valuation Framework
Merck needs a sum of parts. Keytruda gets its own DCF, with sales declining from December 2028 (or 2029) and an IRA price from January 2029. Keytruda Qlex and any new approved uses belong inside that forecast, not in a company-wide growth rate. Cancer and vaccine drugs still in trials are valued with risk-adjusted NPV (rNPV): revenue weighted by the BIO phase rates (7.9% cumulative from Phase I; 9.1% for biologics) at an ordinary cost of capital.
The model then has to answer one question: do the pipeline and the rest of the portfolio refill Keytruda's revenue after exclusivity ends? A sector multiple cannot answer it, because it assumes no single event of this size.
What to Watch in the Financials
Keytruda growth into LOE. At 48.7% of sales, even high-single-digit Keytruda growth moves group revenue. Fewer new approved uses is the early warning.
Two dates, two effects. The compound expiry and the 2029 patents set when volume falls; the expected IRA price from January 2029 sets when price falls. Model each separately.
What the R&D buys. If 24.3% of sales goes on R&D without late-stage trial wins, nothing is lined up to replace Keytruda's cash.
Key Risks
Keytruda LOE. Keytruda is a biologic, and biosimilar copies take sales more slowly than generics of a chemically made drug do. Still, no other product among the six puts so large a share of sales on so near a date.
Medicare price from January 2029. The expected IRA price hits the same product as the patent expiry, so price and volume losses can overlap.
Pipeline delivery. A late-stage trial failure lowers both the pipeline value and the later years of the forecast, because those years assume new drugs replace Keytruda.
A base business, a drug at its patent cliff, a growing biologic and a Phase III asset, each valued year by year and summed to value per share.
- 15 sections, the patent ladder to a year-by-year sum-of-parts valuation and concentration screens
- 39 pages
- a small molecule at its cliff, a biologic growth driver and a pipeline asset weighted by its phase, plus a base business
- 3 drug schedules
- large-cap innovators on filed product concentration and loss-of-exclusivity dates
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's sum-of-parts valuation live across 13 sheets: a base-business DCF at an 8.5% WACC; three drug schedules, each set to marketed or pipeline and to a clinical phase that sets its odds; loss-of-exclusivity cliffs that settle on a generic floor; a calendar-year input that turns a filed patent date into a schedule year; the consolidated bridge to value per share; and patent-cliff, concentration and sensitivity views. Change a drug's LOE year, phase or peak sales, or the WACC, and the value moves.
See what's in the Pharmaceuticals Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Healthcare industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Patent Cliffs and LOE Erosion
How loss-of-exclusivity erodes branded drug revenue: generic unit-share curves, net-price erosion by competitor count, biosimilar contrast via Humira, and a worked fade on a $3,000M brand.
rNPV: Valuing Drug Pipelines
Risk-adjusted NPV for drug pipelines: PoS-weighted cash flows, an 8.5% WACC built on a 4.50% 10-year Treasury rate, and a worked Phase III asset at $1,621M.
Pharma Revenue Concentration Risk
Largest-product revenue share as a risk screen: FY2025 ladder from Pfizer Eliquis 12.7% to Lilly tirzepatide 56.0%, with 25–30% and 40% concentration screens.
Pharma Patent Expiry Dates by Company
Patent and IRA Medicare price dates from six large drugmakers' filings, product by product: where the dates sit in a 10-K, what settled generic entry means, and why one revenue-at-risk figure misleads.