Healthcare · Pharmaceuticals
Pfizer (PFE)
Pfizer after COVID: Eliquis, its largest product, was 12.7% of FY2025 revenue. Why a ~126% GAAP payout reflects non-cash charges, and a staggered LOE calendar.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 Revenue
- $62,579M
- Largest Product
- Eliquis $7,961M (12.7%)
- R&D Intensity
- 16.7% of sales
- Operating Margin
- 22.8% (computed)
- Dividend / GAAP Payout
- $1.72/sh; ~126%
- 2026 LOE Guide
- ~$1.5B (~2.4% of FY2025 rev)
A Portfolio Rebuilt by Deals
Pfizer is rebuilding its portfolio through acquisitions after the pandemic revenue windfall reversed. FY2025 revenue was $62,579M. Eliquis, a blood thinner and the largest product, earned $7,961M (12.7%), the lowest single-drug share of the six large drugmakers covered here.
Low concentration does not mean low patent risk. Pfizer expects to lose ~$1.5B of revenue in 2026, about 2.4% of FY2025 revenue, as drugs lose exclusivity (LOE) and face generic copies. The losses are spread across several products: the arthritis drug Xeljanz in 2026, the breast-cancer drug Ibrance in 2027 and Eliquis generics from 1 April 2028. Each needs its own forecast (see the LOE guide). Eliquis sits below the 25-30% line for elevated concentration (see the concentration map), so Pfizer's risk is a calendar of mid-sized events plus integrating what it bought.
R&D, Margin and Payout
R&D was $10,437M, 16.7% of sales, below the 20.9% average in the survey by PhRMA, the US drug industry body, and at the low end of the ~15-25% large-drugmaker range; Merck spent 24.3%. Integration of Seagen, the cancer-drug developer Pfizer bought in 2023, and pipeline pruning both show up here.
Pfizer, like Merck, does not print an operating income line. Computed from filed components, operating income was $14,244M, a 22.8% margin.
The dividend was $1.72 per share. Dividends paid were $9,771M against GAAP net income of $7,771M, a ~126% GAAP payout: the case the GAAP payout trap guide was written for. Amortisation of acquired intangibles ($4,874M) and asset impairments ($4,940M) cut net income without using cash in the year. Operating cash flow was $11,704M, so dividends took about 83% of it.
Valuation Framework
Pfizer needs a product-by-product forecast of LOE losses for 2026 to 2028. The acquired cancer drugs still in trials are valued with risk-adjusted NPV (rNPV), weighting revenue by the BIO phase rates (7.9% cumulative from Phase I) at an ordinary cost of capital. The Seagen programmes are what has to replace Eliquis sales from 2028. GAAP EPS is the wrong measure of dividend capacity here.
What to Watch in the Financials
The 2026 LOE estimate (~$1.5B). Management's figure is the filed anchor for the near-term forecast. Track product revenue against it each quarter.
GAAP payout (~126%). While amortisation and write-downs run at FY2025 levels, the GAAP payout stays above 100%. Operating cash flow is the better measure of cover.
Eliquis ahead of April 2028. At 12.7% of revenue it is modest, yet it is the largest single loss of sales in the disclosed calendar.
COVID products. Pfizer's 2026 revenue guidance still assumes about $5 billion from its COVID vaccine and treatment (Q4 2025 release), so that line remains a swing factor in the margin.
Key Risks
A staggered LOE calendar. Xeljanz, Ibrance and Eliquis stack up through 2028. None is ~49% of sales like Merck's Keytruda, but the drag is cumulative.
Delivery on acquired programmes. The acquired drugs in trials have to reach approval at roughly the rates the valuation assumes for the rebuild to work.
A base business, a drug at its patent cliff, a growing biologic and a Phase III asset, each valued year by year and summed to value per share.
- 15 sections, the patent ladder to a year-by-year sum-of-parts valuation and concentration screens
- 39 pages
- a small molecule at its cliff, a biologic growth driver and a pipeline asset weighted by its phase, plus a base business
- 3 drug schedules
- large-cap innovators on filed product concentration and loss-of-exclusivity dates
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's sum-of-parts valuation live across 13 sheets: a base-business DCF at an 8.5% WACC; three drug schedules, each set to marketed or pipeline and to a clinical phase that sets its odds; loss-of-exclusivity cliffs that settle on a generic floor; a calendar-year input that turns a filed patent date into a schedule year; the consolidated bridge to value per share; and patent-cliff, concentration and sensitivity views. Change a drug's LOE year, phase or peak sales, or the WACC, and the value moves.
See what's in the Pharmaceuticals Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Healthcare industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Patent Cliffs and LOE Erosion
How loss-of-exclusivity erodes branded drug revenue: generic unit-share curves, net-price erosion by competitor count, biosimilar contrast via Humira, and a worked fade on a $3,000M brand.
Pharma Revenue Concentration Risk
Largest-product revenue share as a risk screen: FY2025 ladder from Pfizer Eliquis 12.7% to Lilly tirzepatide 56.0%, with 25–30% and 40% concentration screens.
The Pharma GAAP Payout Trap
Why Pfizer ~126% and AbbVie ~276% GAAP dividend payout ratios mislead: non-cash charges on acquired assets, one-off gains, and how to test pharma dividends against cash.
Pharma Patent Expiry Dates by Company
Patent and IRA Medicare price dates from six large drugmakers' filings, product by product: where the dates sit in a 10-K, what settled generic entry means, and why one revenue-at-risk figure misleads.
Pharma R&D Intensity by Company
R&D as a share of revenue at six large drugmakers: where acquired R&D and write-downs are booked, what the PhRMA industry average covers, and why spend is not output.