Healthcare · Biotech
Gilead Sciences (GILD)
Franchise durability against a pipeline setback: FY2025 revenue of $29,443M with HIV at 70.5%, Biktarvy at $14,334M and the Trodelvy ASCENT-07 miss.
Selborne Research · · Equity Research Profile
Educational analysis for professional use. This profile is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it is not personalised.
Snapshot
- FY2025 Revenue
- $29,443M
- HIV Portfolio
- $20,752M (70.5%)
- Biktarvy
- $14,334M (+7% YoY)
- GAAP Net Income
- $8,510M
- Operating Cash Flow
- $10,019M
- Cash Runway
- N/A (OCF-positive)
Business Overview
Gilead shows a concentrated franchise that is still growing, set against a pipeline setback. FY2025 revenue was $29,443M and GAAP net income $8,510M. The HIV portfolio brought in $20,752M (+6% YoY), 70.5% of the total, with the daily HIV pill Biktarvy alone at $14,334M (+7% YoY). Operating cash flow was $10,019M, and cash and marketable debt securities were $10.6B at year-end 2025.
At 70.5%, HIV sits mid-table in the concentration guide: below Vertex's cystic fibrosis drugs (92.9% of revenue) and Moderna's COVID vaccines (93.1%), above Regeneron's Dupixent profit share (36.5%). Biktarvy is still growing, though HIV policy and competition move most of the income statement. Operating cash flow is positive, so runway screens do not apply.
How the Numbers Read
R&D was $5,799M in FY2025, split between HIV and oncology. The setback is Trodelvy, Gilead's antibody-drug conjugate for breast cancer. In ASCENT-07, a Phase 3 study in first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (the commonest type, driven by hormones rather than the HER2 protein), it missed its primary endpoint of progression-free survival. Results were presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) 2025.
Remaining oncology value runs on each programme's odds of approval, which belong in the cash flows of a risk-adjusted NPV (rNPV), not in a higher discount rate. In the BIO 2011-2020 study the model uses, 57.8% of Phase III programmes reached an FDA filing (NDA/BLA) and 7.9% of Phase I programmes reached approval (see the phase success guide).
A Citi analyst estimate puts Biktarvy's peak at ~$15B by 2030, only slightly above its FY2025 sales of $14,334M. It is an assumption, so anchor the franchise on filed revenue.
Valuation Framework
Value the parts separately. The HIV franchise gets a DCF on its $20,752M of filed revenue, with Biktarvy as the anchor. The oncology pipeline gets a probability-weighted value, with the odds cut on indications affected by ASCENT-07. Then add the $10.6B of cash. Gilead's HIV drugs are mostly its own sales; any partnered asset would be modelled on Gilead's share, as Regeneron's Dupixent is.
What to Watch in the Financials
HIV's share (70.5%). Biktarvy's 7% growth keeps the concentrated revenue rising. The share only falls meaningfully if oncology adds revenue of its own.
Oncology after ASCENT-07. Rebuild the oncology rNPV with lower odds on the affected indications, and watch whether R&D of $5,799M keeps flowing to programmes that are still advancing.
Key Risks
HIV concentration. Pricing, treatment-guideline shifts or long-acting injectable competitors could shrink the $20,752M line faster than oncology replaces it.
Further pipeline setbacks. ASCENT-07 already cut the probability-weighted value of a key oncology asset. Another Phase 3 failure would cut it further and leave HIV carrying more of the group.
A clinical-stage company's two programmes are valued year by year and its cash rolled forward to first sales, beside a franchise owner valued through its patent cliff.
- 15 sections, the clinical stage ladder to cash runway, multi-programme rNPV and a patent cliff
- 41 pages
- a two-programme clinical-stage company with its runway and dilution, a concentrated franchise owner and a diversified profitable company
- 3 worked companies
- profitable franchise owners and a cash-burner, on filed concentration, cash and burn
- 6-company screen
The Excel model is the primer's rNPV engine live across 13 sheets: a phase-by-phase PoS chain on BIO 2011-2020 rates, from Phase I to Approved; three worked companies, each switchable between clinical and commercial mode and valued year by year over 20 years, with later-phase R&D weighted by the odds of reaching it; a valuation summary with franchise floors; a runway calculator that rolls real cash forward, shows when it runs out if the lead fails, and prices the dilution from the raise; concentration and patent-cliff views; and a sensitivity grid. Change PoS, peak sales, R&D or the discount rate and the value moves.
See what's in the Biotech Sector Primer →£25 PDF · £59 with the Excel model · £159 for all three Healthcare industries
Learn the Concepts
Understand the valuation frameworks and metrics used in this analysis.
Clinical Trial Success Rates by Phase
FDA phase definitions and BIO/Informa success rates: 52.0% to 28.9% to 57.8% to 90.6%, cumulative 7.9% LOA from Phase I; the later Citeline 2014–2023 data give 6.7%.
Biotech Franchise Concentration
Lead-franchise revenue share for biotech: Vertex cystic fibrosis 92.9%, Gilead HIV 70.5%, Moderna COVID 93.1%; growing versus shrinking franchises and partnership booking traps.
Biotech Partnership Economics
Biotech profit-share partnerships: Regeneron Dupixent $5.2B profit share versus Sanofi $17.8B global sales, the 3.4x booking trap, and rNPV on the economic share alone.